
Last modified: 2016-04-25 by ivan sache
Keywords: alhama de murcia | 
Links: FOTW homepage |
search | 
disclaimer and copyright | 
write us | 
mirrors
Flag of Alhama de Murcia - Image by Ivan Sache, 1 May 2015
See also:
The municipality of Alhama de Murcia (21,298 inhabitants in 2014; 31,155 ha; municipal website) is located in the center of the Region of Murcia, 30 km west of Murcia. The municipality is made of the town of Alhama de Murcia and of the villages of El Berro, Gebas, Las Cañadas, El Cañarico and La Costera.
Alhama de Murcia, located in the Guadalentín valley, was already  
settled in the Neolithic. The Roman thermae (1st -4th century) are the  
most important archeological remains in the municipality; they  
included two different sections, one for healing and another for  
leisure. The thermae were transformed to a hammām by the Moors,  
mentioned by Al-Qazwini in the 13th century. The place, named Hammā bi-Laqwār, was renamed Alhama after the Christian reconquest; in Arabic, a natural bath with warm water (hammā) is distinct from warm thermae (hammām).
Enjoyed in 1494 by the German traveller Hieronymus Münzer, the Alhama  
baths subsequently declined until the establishment of a spa, Hotel  
Balneario, in 1848. Erected in eclectic and neo-classic architecture,  
the three-storey building reused the old, vaulted baths, to which the  
most modern technologies were appended. The public swimming-pool was  
allocated to the poor, while the richer customers had private baths  
and dwellings equipped with all comfort. In the 1st quarter of the  
20th century, the Alhama baths attracted customers from all Spain,  
including celebrities such as Santiago Ramón y Cajal (1852-1934),  
Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine (1906). The drying up of the  
sources and the transformation of the hotel into an hospital during  
the Civil War resulted in the abandon of the spa, which was eventually  
demolished in 1972. Preserved, the Roman thermae were proclaimed a  
National Historic and Artistic Monument in 1983 (museum website).
The castle of Alhama was established in the 11th-12th century by the Moors on a hill dominating the town; watching the Guadalentín valley, the castle was part of the defence belt that protected the borders with the Kingdom of Granada, in the south, and the Kingdom of Aragón, in the north. After the Christian reconquest, the town was incorporated to the Royal crown, until transferred in 1387 to the Fajardo lineage. The fall of the Kingdom of Granada decreased the strategic significance of the fortress, which was abandoned and progressively ruined.
Ivan Sache, 1 May 2015
The flag of Alhama de Murcia (photo, photo, photo, photo) is blue with the municipal coat of arms in the center.
The coat of arms of Alhama de Murcia is prescribed by Decree No.  
2,355, adopted on 16 July 1970 by the Spanish Government and published  
on 25 August 1970 in the Spanish official gazette, No. 203, p. 13,883 (text).
The coat of arms, which is a "rehabilitation" of the arms  
traditionally used by the municipality, is described as follows:
Coat of arms: Per fess, 1. Azure a castle or surrounded dexter by a sword sinister by a lion rampant, 2. Azure a fortified house ruined or. The shield surmounted by a Marquis coronet or, evoking the Marquis de los Vélez.
The Royal Academy reviewed the proposal of coat of arms adopted on 11  
December 1968 by the Municipal Council. The supporting memoir stated  
that Alhama once belonged to the Fajardo lineage, therefore the use of  
the arms of this important lineage on the proposed municipal arms.  
However, the use of a knight's helmet to surmount the shield is  
improper in civic arms. The municipality recognized that the old arms  
of the town, first documented in the 18th century and visible on some  
official buildings, do not include any charge related to the Fajardo  
lineage. Accordingly, the arms of Fajardo should be evoked only in a  
Marquis' coronet surmounting the shield and evoking the Marquis de los  
Vélez; the municipality should stick to its traditional arms.
[Boletín de la Real Academia de la Historia, 1973, 170: 2,  402-403]
Ivan Sache, 1 May 2015